Development Code Update

Expressed concern that business outreach during the development code process was inadequate, noting that many local business owners were unaware of proposed changes.

Urged the commission to codify changes rather than relying on recommendations, particularly regarding notice of minor use permits, city manager waivers, and ministerial reviews, while advocating for de novo call-up review powers.

Submitted written comments expressing concern regarding the proposed development code update as it relates to maximum industry building regulations.

Urged the commission to adopt the development code update, stating it will make the process more predictable and efficient for business investment.

Commended the code update effort but noted the importance of balancing streamlined processes with effective communication and resident input.

Praised city staff but stressed that the city must always prioritize transparency and the best interests of residents over speed or outside interests.

Suggested adding museums as permitted uses in residential zones, reducing setbacks for higher density, supporting taller downtown heights, and adding fire-hardening requirements.

Expressed concern that public comments were not adequately included in the staff report and suggested longer notification timelines and better public context for ministerial projects.

Praised the commission's thorough discussion, supported taller building heights downtown, and noted that the code can always be updated later.

Advocated for heat mitigation rules like green roofs, keeping land north of the freeway as open space, supporting taller downtown heights, and protecting trees.

Complimented city management for updating the outdated development codes and shared developer experiences regarding bureaucratic hurdles.

Submitted written comments providing considerations related to single room occupancy housing provisions in the draft code.