Zoning

SB 79

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (2)

At a glance

Public comments
2
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed May 26, 2026.

Public comments (4)

SupportiveKate PhilipsMay 26, 2026

NAMI San Mateo County board member urging that new high-density housing include extremely-low and very-low income units, ideally with concentrated permanent supportive housing and services.

Planning Commission — May 26, 2026 · 2:27:18 →
SupportiveZach RozlenMay 26, 2026

Returned to support the SB 79 plan, suggesting the city could even go beyond the state minimums and add more housing capacity near transit.

Planning Commission — May 26, 2026 · 2:30:04 →
OpposedJennifer PfaffMar 16, 2026

Speaking in her personal capacity as a resident, Pfaff said Burlingame has 'done everything right' on planning and housing and called SB 79 a builder's-remedy-like state overreach that could obliterate the downtown plan; she supported concentrating capacity on Rollins Road/Millbrae instead.

City Council — March 16, 2026 · 2:48:03 →
OpposedHoward WettanMar 16, 2026

The Parks & Recreation Commissioner urged the city not to put housing on Washington Park or Burlingame High School, calling them the most special, fully used parts of the city, and asked staff to leverage existing Rollins Road planning work instead.

City Council — March 16, 2026 · 2:51:08 →