Development

Bayside land use alternatives

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
3
Last 30 days
0

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 21, 2026.

Public comments (4)

ConcernedKirby AltmanSep 21, 2026

Wants more emphasis on recreation and public benefit and less on economic development; skeptical of housing east of 101 due to missing schools, groceries and fire services, and of a convention center.

City Council — September 21, 2026 · 31:33 →
MixedAmy ChungSep 21, 2026

A Citizens Advisory Committee member who wants variety in heights and densities so community benefits can be funded, and a broader definition of mixed use; says reduced FAR alone is not an incentive.

City Council — September 21, 2026 · 34:26 →
SupportiveKirkSep 21, 2026

Owner of One Bay Plaza and a Peninsula Crossing partner; supports Alternative 2 for its flexibility to develop residential or hotel uses on his properties.

City Council — September 21, 2026 · 37:06 →
ConcernedGita DevSep 21, 2026

Sierra Club representative; if housing is allowed, urges biosafety-level restrictions on biotech labs like Redwood City's, and questions Burlingame's 100-foot shoreline setback.

City Council — September 21, 2026 · 39:01 →