Development

Robertson angled parking

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)Opposed (3)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
10
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Sep 1, 2026.

Public comments (10)

OpposedShelley CrabbettSep 1, 2026

Opposed angled parking — warned of cut-through traffic onto Doheny and Le Pierre, dangerous backing-out maneuvers, and urged a parking structure, shuttles, and flashing lights near Horace Mann instead.

City Council Study Session - Sep 1, 2026 · 24:28 →
MixedJeff LevineSep 1, 2026

A former Traffic and Parking Commission chair who supports improving parking but urged the council not to prejudge a study outcome, given 800–1,000 vehicles per hour already exceed one lane's capacity.

City Council Study Session - Sep 1, 2026 · 28:03 →
SupportiveDoris KerrickSep 1, 2026

Strongly supported studying the change — not for parking, but to slow dangerous traffic near Horace Mann, recounting a crash that put an SUV partially on the sidewalk near her children.

City Council Study Session - Sep 1, 2026 · 30:30 →
SupportiveMichael CarrickSep 1, 2026

Speaking as a resident (not commissioner), backed making Robertson 'a place to go, not a place to go through,' citing red-light running near Horace Mann and the D line's future impact on traffic patterns.

City Council Study Session - Sep 1, 2026 · 33:19 →
MixedCorey ClemSep 1, 2026

Supported rethinking Robertson but said angled parking is the wrong 'yes' — urged complete-street principles, questioned through-traffic share, and raised bike lane and D line first/last-mile gaps.

City Council Study Session - Sep 1, 2026 · 36:31 →
NeutralApostle ArnoldSep 1, 2026

Delivered an eccentric comment linking a 'Louis Vuitton Kingdom' hotel proposal to the parking discussion, including claims of flying cars and a luxury police collaboration.

City Council Study Session - Sep 1, 2026 · 40:07 →
SupportiveArthur ShermanSep 1, 2026

Owner of Lodge Bread Company on Robertson — said parking scarcity is crippling the business, with three straight money-losing periods, and urged the city to continue pursuing angled parking or other solutions.

City Council Study Session - Sep 1, 2026 · 43:48 →
SupportiveDavid MirharuniSep 1, 2026

Property owner on Robertson — urged a yes vote to study angled parking, saying vacant retail could force redevelopment and that the city needs a vision for the corridor now, not in three to four years.

City Council Study Session - Sep 1, 2026 · 46:34 →
OpposedShelley CrabbettSep 1, 2026

Returned with two suggestions: a shuttle from nearby garages and flashing warning lights near Horace Mann, citing her own serious red-light crash at Robertson and Charleville.

City Council Study Session - Sep 1, 2026 · 1:47:02 →
OpposedLisa WolfeSep 1, 2026

Called in to oppose the plan — predicted backups north of Wilshire, blocked left turns at Charleville and Gregory, dangerous 9.5-foot buffer lane, and hazards to cyclists.

City Council Study Session - Sep 1, 2026 · 1:48:06 →