Planning Commission interview process (written)
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 22, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Written comment objecting to any appointment Tuesday and asking for re-scheduled interviews with a minimum three-day notice, citing the Joiner case.
City Council Adjourned Study Session - Sep 22, 2026 · 25:41 →Written comment objecting to Tuesday's appointments and demanding a three-day minimum notice designed to ensure public participation.
City Council Adjourned Study Session - Sep 22, 2026 · 26:48 →Written comment asking the council to include residents in the process and objecting to the appointment recommendation.
City Council Adjourned Study Session - Sep 22, 2026 · 27:08 →Written comment questioning why the process was rushed and interviews held around the Jewish high holidays, and asking that appointment decisions be deferred.
City Council Adjourned Study Session - Sep 22, 2026 · 27:31 →Written comment supporting all commission interviews being held in a public forum, drawing on her own selection experience.
City Council Adjourned Study Session - Sep 22, 2026 · 28:52 →Written comment concerned appointments were being made behind closed doors and that private meetings with applicants may have occurred; registered an objection.
City Council Adjourned Study Session - Sep 22, 2026 · 29:36 →Written comment saying proper notice was not followed, calling the process a 'fast one' on residents, and urging the city to reopen applications.
City Council Adjourned Study Session - Sep 22, 2026 · 30:28 →Written comment objecting to any appointments Tuesday and citing the Joiner case in support of a three-day notice and rescheduling.
City Council Adjourned Study Session - Sep 22, 2026 · 31:23 →