Planning Commission appointment process (written comment)
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 22, 2026.
Public comments (5)
Written comment urging the council not to appoint commissioners until the public gets adequate notice of interviews, saying the September 10 notice prevented meaningful participation.
City Council Adjourned (Regular) - Sep 22, 2026 · 29:48 →Written comment citing Brown Act concerns, asking for re-noticed interviews with at least three days' notice and re-interviewing for the first position.
City Council Adjourned (Regular) - Sep 22, 2026 · 30:09 →Writing for the Municipal League of Beverly Hills, called appointing a developer 'a direct and obvious conflict of interest,' said the city faces an 'invasion' of unwanted projects, and urged the council to reject the committee's recommendations.
City Council Adjourned (Regular) - Sep 22, 2026 · 30:51 →Written comment asking that interviews be made accessible to the public and expressing concern that a developer applicant poses a potential conflict on the city's most impactful commission.
City Council Adjourned (Regular) - Sep 22, 2026 · 31:55 →Written comment citing the Joiner case, requesting interviews be rescheduled with at least three days' notice designed to ensure public attendance and participation.
City Council Adjourned (Regular) - Sep 22, 2026 · 32:19 →