Development

October 7th Memorial design change

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Opposed (3)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 24, 2026.

Public comments (7)

OpposedAndrew KoleMar 24, 2026

Questioned the escalating costs and 24-hour security needs, and suggested the city rethink the whole memorial and instead do something meaningful for survivors.

City Council Adjourned Study Session - Mar 24, 2026 · 17:04 →
OpposedPeter OstroffMar 24, 2026

Said there's little resident support, no reason to rush during wartime, and the new cost estimate can't be trusted — urged the council to go back to the drawing board.

City Council Adjourned Study Session - Mar 24, 2026 · 19:37 →
SupportiveLaura SteinMar 24, 2026

Ad hoc committee member defended the process, announced a new $250,000 Goldhirsh-Yellen Foundation pledge she personally secured, and vowed to keep fundraising hard.

City Council Adjourned Study Session - Mar 24, 2026 · 23:03 →
SupportiveJordana YechielMar 24, 2026

Called the memorial a symbol that the Jewish community is safe and treasured in Beverly Hills, revealed her own $50,000 pledge, and urged the council to stay on course.

City Council Adjourned Study Session - Mar 24, 2026 · 25:00 →
OpposedDr. Julian GoldMar 24, 2026

Former mayor who created the flag memorial said he can't support the replacement design, calling the rusted steel unappealing and urging the council to take time and possibly solicit other designs.

City Council Adjourned Study Session - Mar 24, 2026 · 38:06 →
MixedPamela BeckMar 24, 2026

Supports the second design mainly out of fear the project will lose momentum and fall by the wayside if not approved.

City Council Adjourned Study Session - Mar 24, 2026 · 40:24 →
SupportiveDr. Erica FelsenthalMar 24, 2026

Written comment urging the council to move forward with the sculpture as a lasting symbol of remembrance against hatred and forgetting.

City Council Adjourned Study Session - Mar 24, 2026 · 37:32 →