Environment

E-9 decorative pavers

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (5)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed May 19, 2026.

Public comments (5)

OpposedJohn D. LucaMay 19, 2026

Urged preservation of the Pereira building's concentric-circle pavers, calling Douglas Emmett cost-cutting and asking for Cultural Heritage Commission review.

City Council Regular Meeting and Parking Authority - May 19, 2026 · 38:13 →
OpposedCheryl FeldmanMay 19, 2026

Said she witnessed the pavers being repaired with matching tile before, so replacements can be found; urged preserving architectural landmarks.

City Council Regular Meeting and Parking Authority - May 19, 2026 · 33:09 →
OpposedSteve MayerMay 19, 2026

Called the consent-calendar placement outrageous, said the property is a historic contributor, and outlined the review commissions the item should pass through first.

City Council Regular Meeting and Parking Authority - May 19, 2026 · 36:32 →
OpposedRebecca PynoosMay 19, 2026

As a former Cultural Heritage chair and current architecture commission chair, said the pavers are part of a potential historic resource deserving extra review.

City Council Regular Meeting and Parking Authority - May 19, 2026 · 38:12 →
OpposedAnn RubenMay 19, 2026

Called in from nearby to ask the council to keep the architect's vision intact rather than replace the pavers with concrete.

City Council Regular Meeting and Parking Authority - May 19, 2026 · 39:31 →