Development
232 Tower Drive project (appellant)
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Opposed (1)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 1
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 21, 2026.
Public comments (1)
OpposedKen DusigJul 21, 2026
The appellant argued builder's remedy law unfairly punishes Carthay Circle residents for Beverly Hills' housing element failure, that AB 130's CEQA exemption should not apply retroactively, and that a traffic engineer's report documents unmitigable health and safety impacts.
City Council Regular Meeting and Parking Authority Meeting - Jul 21, 2026 · 50:13 →