California Record
Berkeley
Zoning

Landmarks Preservation Procedures

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (5)Opposed (4)Neutral (2)

At a glance

Public comments
11
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Apr 15, 2026.

Public comments (11)

SupportiveChrissy HoffmanApr 15, 2026

Supported a 100-signature threshold to balance preservation and housing development.

City Council (Regular) - Apr 15, 2026 · 2:18:18 →
SupportiveJulie NoctwayApr 15, 2026

Praised Berkeley's architectural heritage and urged the council to listen to the Landmarks Commission's recommendations.

City Council (Regular) - Apr 15, 2026 · 2:19:22 →
OpposedClaudia HunkkaApr 15, 2026

Expressed disappointment with proposed changes to landmark requirements while corridor zoning is under review.

City Council (Regular) - Apr 15, 2026 · 2:21:29 →
OpposedKelly HammergrenApr 15, 2026

Expressed concern that the Landmarks Commission was not properly advised by state historic officers and argued 400 signatures is too high.

City Council (Regular) - Apr 15, 2026 · 2:16:30 →
SupportiveSteve FinacomApr 15, 2026

Spoke as a Landmarks Commissioner in support of the commission's unanimous recommendation of 100 signatures.

City Council (Regular) - Apr 15, 2026 · 2:27:00 →
NeutralRebecca MirvishApr 15, 2026

Noted the practical difficulties of gathering signatures during election seasons.

City Council (Regular) - Apr 15, 2026 · 2:35:00 →
OpposedIsaac WarshauerApr 15, 2026

Spoke for BAHA against high signature requirements and argued landmarking manages collective cultural resources.

City Council (Regular) - Apr 15, 2026 · 2:23:33 →
OpposedArlene SilkApr 15, 2026

Shared history as first chair of the 1975 Landmarks Commission and warned high signature thresholds gut preservation.

City Council (Regular) - Apr 15, 2026 · 2:30:39 →
SupportiveMoniApr 15, 2026

Supported 100 signatures and preservation of Berkeley's historic buildings.

City Council (Regular) - Apr 15, 2026 · 2:32:45 →
NeutralBryce NesbittApr 15, 2026

Suggested reforms for moving historic structures as an alternative to restrictive signature thresholds.

City Council (Regular) - Apr 15, 2026 · 2:28:02 →
SupportiveJaniceApr 15, 2026

Supported a 100-signature threshold and shorter lapse timelines for development applications.

City Council (Regular) - Apr 15, 2026 · 2:31:42 →