Expansion of Police Surveillance and Flock Safety Contracts
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 8, 2026.
Public comments (9)
Stated that crime victims and families need effective safety tools like Flock cameras to help solve violent crimes.
City Council (Special) - May 8, 2026 · 1:31:25 →Stated that mass surveillance does not lower crime and urged investment in affordable housing, workforce development, and community programs.
City Council (Special) - May 8, 2026 · 2:53:40 →Spoke on behalf of Friends of Adeline in strong opposition to expanding surveillance infrastructure, arguing it undermines sanctuary city commitments.
City Council (Special) - May 8, 2026 · 1:33:35 →Argued that Flock claims ownership of data and shares it with ICE and CBP, putting all residents at risk.
City Council (Special) - May 8, 2026 · 1:34:54 →Spoke for the Commission on Labor urging suspension of the contract due to Flock's use of low-paid overseas sweatshop labor for data annotation.
City Council (Special) - May 8, 2026 · 1:36:08 →Expressed strong support from the Downtown Berkeley Association for surveillance tools to address severe safety concerns among merchants and visitors.
City Council (Special) - May 8, 2026 · 1:57:08 →Speaking for the Berkeley Chamber of Commerce, supported thoughtfully managed public safety technology with strong oversight.
City Council (Special) - May 8, 2026 · 3:37:17 →Representing the Bay Area Council, supported continued use of ALPRs and related technology to help police recover property and solve crimes.
City Council (Special) - May 8, 2026 · 3:39:45 →Police Accountability Board Chair criticized the lack of competitive bidding and urged the council to reject the non-competitive contract.
City Council (Special) - May 8, 2026 · 3:50:18 →