Development
2026 Bicycle Plan Update
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Supportive (2)Concerned (3)Neutral (1)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 16, 2026.
Public comments (6)
ConcernedMakai FreemanJun 16, 2026
Expressed concerns about accessibility for disabled drivers and pedestrians in relation to bicycle infrastructure plans.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 16, 2026 · 27:29 →SupportiveTeo PassellJun 16, 2026
Expressed support for the bike plan and encouraged streamlined implementation.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 16, 2026 · 44:18 →SupportiveCharles SiegelJun 16, 2026
Urged the council to approve the bike plan revision on consent.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 16, 2026 · 48:35 →NeutralKellyJun 16, 2026
Called for before and after bicycle counts to measure the actual effectiveness of bike plan infrastructure investments.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 16, 2026 · 53:01 →ConcernedHelen WalshJun 16, 2026
Expressed concern that the bicycle plan lacks a defined accessibility evaluation framework for seniors and disabled residents.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 16, 2026 · 56:55 →ConcernedNancy RaderJun 16, 2026
Urged pulling the bike plan to action to restore language requiring strict evaluation of emergency response times.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 16, 2026 · 58:03 →