Landlocked cannabis parcel at 301 Gallagher
Summary
A cannabis facility can't get building permits because its parcel has no legal street access — records suggest it's been that way since 1880 — and the neighboring owner wants an uneconomical price for an easement. The commission recommended keeping the strict condition anyway.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 1
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 7, 2026.
Impact analysis
The applicant says the easement price and ~$300,000 in tenant improvements are being held hostage by the access condition.
The neighboring property owner who controls the easement, and the city's interest in not enforcing private deals.
The cannabis project applicant, who has paid permit fees and cannot begin improvements.
Mentions & discussions (1)
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for Banning
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.