Expanded public hearing notifications — and who still gets left out
Summary
A resident complained that agendas aren't posted where meetings actually happen — the chamber entrance — leaving attendees unsure whether meetings are on or cancelled. He asked that agendas be posted on the exterior window as in past years.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 1
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Nov 4, 2026.
Impact analysis
Larger mailings and on-site signs will add roughly $800–900 or more to some development applications, costs that may flow into housing prices.
Anyone who shows up to a meeting would know immediately whether it's happening.
Renters in single-family homes and ADUs still get no direct mail under the code as written; applicants pay higher noticing costs.
Mentions & discussions (3)
Planning Commission - Nov 4, 2026
Notices of hearings on new development would now go to property owners within 600 feet (double the old radius) and be published 20 days out instead of 10, plus required on-site signs. Commissioners added a request that notices also go out in Spanish and to occupants, since renters — like those on Hathaway Street during the warehouse project — often get no direct notice at all.
Planning Commission - Aug 5, 2026
Commissioner Evans flagged that small community events are hard for residents — especially newcomers — to find out about, since the city lacks a public information officer and its community app is outdated.
Planning Commission - Jan 7, 2026
A resident complained that agendas aren't posted where meetings actually happen — the chamber entrance — leaving attendees unsure whether meetings are on or cancelled. He asked that agendas be posted on the exterior window as in past years.
Related development
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for Banning
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.