California Record
Bakersfield
Zoning

General Plan Amendment and Zone Change No. 24-0003

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (6)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jul 16, 2026.

Public comments (7)

OpposedDennis McClainJul 16, 2026

Objected to the Snow Road rezone, citing traffic congestion, loss of rural farm life, and noise conflicts with livestock.

Planning Commission · 1:14:24 →
OpposedMaureen BrightJul 16, 2026

Argued that the MND is unlawful because mineral rights owners received no notice, horizontal drilling is impossible, and the project takes away oil access rights.

Planning Commission · 1:17:01 →
OpposedBrandy WilliamsJul 16, 2026

Objected to high-density homes bordering long-standing rural properties, noting conflicts with farm animals and agricultural heritage.

Planning Commission · 1:29:49 →
OpposedDominic PitinoJul 16, 2026

Questioned traffic studies, groundwater well impacts, and the lack of buffering and infrastructure consistency.

Planning Commission · 1:32:57 →
OpposedChase PreciadoJul 16, 2026

Requested denial of the project because the MND fails to address greenhouse gases, hazardous materials, and wildlife impacts.

Planning Commission · 1:39:06 →
NeutralMichael DousterJul 16, 2026

Noted that discussions with the developer regarding a retention basin and a 50-foot setback mitigated some of his concerns.

Planning Commission · 1:43:04 →
OpposedCarson MayJul 16, 2026

Objected to the rezone due to land use incompatibility, school overcrowding, and water table changes from impermeable surfaces.

Planning Commission · 1:44:57 →