California Record
Antioch
Development

Inclusionary Housing Ordinance

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (11)Opposed (2)

At a glance

Public comments
15
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 11, 2026.

Public comments (15)

SupportiveTahira DeanMar 11, 2026

Stated that inclusionary housing policies are legally sound and constitutional, urging the council to move forward with the ordinance.

Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee (Regular) - Mar 11, 2026 · 6:30:44 →
SupportiveJoey Flagle-MishloveMar 11, 2026

Spoke on behalf of a housing coalition supporting the inclusionary housing ordinance, suggesting a stronger 20% requirement and provisions for extremely low-income households.

Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee (Regular) - Mar 11, 2026 · 5:51:56 →
OpposedAnthony JordanMar 11, 2026

Argued that the inclusionary housing ordinance is an unconstitutional taking and an illegal fee extraction that will ultimately drive up housing costs for first-time homebuyers.

Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee (Regular) - Mar 11, 2026 · 99:40:00 →
MixedAnthony CarrollMar 11, 2026

Representing Carpenters Local 152, supported the housing ordinance but asked the council to delay the vote to include labor standards and prevailing wage requirements in the housing trust fund.

Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee (Regular) - Mar 11, 2026 · 6:06:02 →
SupportivePastor JosieMar 11, 2026

Expressed personal support for the ordinance as a landlord and pastor, encouraging a 20% set-aside and land dedication options to support the most vulnerable residents.

Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee (Regular) - Mar 11, 2026 · 6:09:19 →
SupportiveCecilia PerezMar 11, 2026

Urged the council to pass an inclusionary housing ordinance with a 20% requirement to ensure working families and seniors can afford to live in Antioch.

Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee (Regular) - Mar 11, 2026 · 6:17:39 →
SupportiveKayla DiGiorgioFeb 4, 2026

Supported the ordinance but emphasized the need for extremely low-income housing tiers.

Planning Commission (Regular) - Feb 4, 2026 · 52:56 →
MixedChris PalomoFeb 4, 2026

Supported the ordinance but requested labor standards for projects using trust fund money.

Planning Commission (Regular) - Feb 4, 2026 · 59:00 →
SupportiveSuzanne DershowitzFeb 4, 2026

Supported the ordinance, noting that legal precedents support such land-use restrictions.

Planning Commission (Regular) - Feb 4, 2026 · 55:47 →
SupportiveDevin WilliamsFeb 4, 2026

Supported the ordinance but urged for a 20% requirement and stronger on-site construction mandates.

Planning Commission (Regular) - Feb 4, 2026 · 38:07 →
OpposedMark JordanFeb 4, 2026

Opposed the ordinance, citing concerns about legal challenges and property rights.

Planning Commission (Regular) - Feb 4, 2026 · 42:33 →
SupportiveMillie PhillipsFeb 4, 2026

Supported the ordinance and requested a 20% requirement to help vulnerable families.

Planning Commission (Regular) - Feb 4, 2026 · 50:46 →
SupportiveGreg ColleyFeb 4, 2026

Supported the ordinance as a matter of justice and community well-being.

Planning Commission (Regular) - Feb 4, 2026 · 44:37 →
SupportiveJoey Flagle MishloveFeb 4, 2026

Supported the ordinance but requested specific tiers for extremely low-income housing.

Planning Commission (Regular) - Feb 4, 2026 · 47:37 →
SupportiveDevin WilliamsJan 21, 2026

Speaking on behalf of the Raise the Roof Coalition and 12 community organizations, the speaker urged the commission to support a strong Inclusionary Housing Ordinance with a 20% inclusionary rate when it comes before them on February 4th.

Planning Commission (Regular) - Jan 21, 2026 · 1:27 →