Cannabis Dispensary
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Proposed Sutter Creek Cannabis Dispensary→At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 19, 2026.
Public comments (7)
The First 5 executive director praised early prevention in mental health and later warned that young children have already appeared in the county ER from THC edibles, urging caution on the dispensary.
Board of Supervisors — May 19, 2026 · 22:07 →A Sutter Creek resident said the proposed site is a 13-minute walk from the Danco housing and next to a high school, urging the Board to pressure Sutter Creek to reject the project.
Board of Supervisors — May 19, 2026 · 55:19 →A Sutter Creek resident presented a Yale School of Medicine study on rising psychosis and schizophrenia after Connecticut legalized cannabis, urging the Board to keep the dispensary out.
Board of Supervisors — May 19, 2026 · 59:42 →A Sutter Creek resident described her son's violent behavior while vaping THC and warned of impaired driving, reduced property values, and youth normalization if the dispensary opens.
Board of Supervisors — May 19, 2026 · 1:05:26 →A Sutter Creek resident said Amador High's principal wouldn't return her calls, warned about gummy overdoses and school vaping, and noted Amador County voted against recreational marijuana legalization.
Board of Supervisors — May 19, 2026 · 1:13:21 →Sutter Creek's contract city planner clarified the process: a zoning ordinance amendment allowing one dispensary with a conditional use permit must come before any site plan permit.
Board of Supervisors — May 19, 2026 · 1:20:33 →A Fiddletown cancer survivor noted dispensaries near UC Davis already serve patients, and raised concerns about large cash holdings at dispensaries attracting robbery-related crime.
Board of Supervisors — May 19, 2026 · 1:22:26 →