Agritourism ordinance
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 9, 2026.
Public comments (4)
Asked whether the agritourism ordinance includes low-impact camping, whether the county has such an ordinance, and questioned parking for 50 people on a one-acre parcel.
Board of Supervisors — June 9, 2026 · 2:19:30 →A second-generation wine grape farmer urged an affirmative vote, saying it would help small producers and county tourism; asked about ministerial vs. discretionary permits.
Board of Supervisors — June 9, 2026 · 2:25:42 →Speaking for Foothill Conservancy, urged that events over 50 people require a full discretionary use permit with neighbor notice and environmental review, and asked about wedding venues.
Board of Supervisors — June 9, 2026 · 2:47:07 →A grower noted the winery ordinance's setback and property-size framework as a possible model, while noting her operation isn't on a preferred road.
Board of Supervisors — June 9, 2026 · 2:56:52 →