Fremont Avenue Interchange Project & 710 Corridor Funds
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 14
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 9, 2026.
Public comments (14)
An urban planner with 25 years of experience questioned why Alhambra is acting as the project sponsor for Caltrans and urged the council to halt the agreement.
City Council (Closed) - Mar 9, 2026 · 1:44:20 →Expressed concern that residents were promised a town hall before any votes on the 710 project and asked the council to listen to the community.
City Council (Closed) - Mar 9, 2026 · 1:48:20 →Suggested it is premature to sign the agreement tonight and noted that the Fremont interchange improvements primarily benefit regional commuters rather than Alhambra residents.
City Council (Closed) - Mar 9, 2026 · 1:50:30 →Echoed previous speakers, urging the council to hold a town hall meeting first and questioning the value of the Fremont improvements relative to rising costs.
City Council (Closed) - Mar 9, 2026 · 1:54:50 →Argued that pushing a project that brings more cars up Fremont ignores resident input and called for a town hall.
City Council (Closed) - Mar 9, 2026 · 1:57:04 →Questioned why Alhambra is spending reduced Measure R funds on projects that mostly benefit drivers from other cities who opposed the 710 extension.
City Council (Closed) - Mar 9, 2026 · 1:59:31 →Warned the council not to vote on the item, explaining that EIR scoping meetings are distinct from general town halls and pointing out a lack of cut-through traffic data.
City Council (Closed) - Mar 9, 2026 · 2:10:50 →Suggested postponing interaction with Caltrans until a community design workshop can be held.
City Council (Closed) - Mar 9, 2026 · 2:07:47 →Shared anxiety over moving so quickly on a complex project without fully understanding terms like 'braid' and requested a well-publicized town hall.
City Council (Closed) - Mar 9, 2026 · 2:09:59 →Argued that improving the Fremont interchange will only induce more cut-through traffic and urged the council to ask key questions about cost and resident benefit.
City Council (Closed) - Mar 9, 2026 · 2:15:01 →Questioned the urgency of signing the cooperative agreement and asked how much of the $241 million Measure R fund remains uncommitted.
City Council (Closed) - Mar 9, 2026 · 2:19:58 →Expressed support for the braided concept to manage 710 traffic but echoed calls for more community meetings and clarification on cost overruns.
City Council (Closed) - Mar 9, 2026 · 2:24:14 →Expressed deep distrust of the city's process and consultants, criticizing the placement of the item on the consent calendar.
City Council (Closed) - Mar 9, 2026 · 2:26:35 →Expressed shock at the item moving forward, arguing that pedestrian and bike improvements were sidelined to fund freeway expansion.
City Council (Closed) - Mar 9, 2026 · 2:30:36 →