California Record
Alhambra
Development

Displacement Concerns at 110 South Chapel Avenue Development

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (5)Concerned (2)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Feb 9, 2026.

Public comments (7)

OpposedHolly PendergastFeb 9, 2026

Spoke against the approved development at 110 S. Chapel Ave. that is displacing long-term affordable housing tenants and requested a retroactive appeal process.

City Council (Regular) - Feb 9, 2026 · 11:34 →
OpposedStephen HolmanFeb 9, 2026

Expressed frustration that neighbor and tenant concerns regarding the 110 S. Chapel project have been ignored by the city.

City Council (Regular) - Feb 9, 2026 · 15:17 →
OpposedElizabeth PlacenciaFeb 9, 2026

Shared that she has lived at 110 S. Chapel since 1989 and criticized the eviction of low-income tenants for a project marketed as affordable.

City Council (Regular) - Feb 9, 2026 · 16:09 →
OpposedNoemi PlacenciaFeb 9, 2026

Requested council support and consideration for displaced lifelong residents losing their affordable housing.

City Council (Regular) - Feb 9, 2026 · 17:24 →
OpposedMonique GuzmanFeb 9, 2026

Stated that longtime local families are being priced out and displaced by luxury apartments.

City Council (Regular) - Feb 9, 2026 · 18:28 →
ConcernedJose PlacenciaFeb 9, 2026

Spoke via a Spanish translator to demand a meeting with officials to address tenant needs and relocation assistance.

City Council (Regular) - Feb 9, 2026 · 19:26 →
ConcernedAlejandro CovarrivasFeb 9, 2026

Criticized the high appeal fees ($3,000 plus 2% processing) that prevent ordinary residents from challenging controversial developments.

City Council (Regular) - Feb 9, 2026 · 20:11 →