Measure D Open Space and Agricultural Regulations

Expressed concern about rushing a ballot measure and urged the board to publicly disclose all polling questions, methodology, and full results if the contract is approved.

Objected to using public funds for polling related to Measure D and argued that waiving competitive bidding rules was unjustified.

Voiced support for the poll, stating that Measure D has caused unintended negative consequences for agriculture over the past 25 years.

Supported moving forward with the poll, arguing that protecting open space and supporting agriculture should be complementary goals and that rules need updating.

Opposed the polling contract, arguing it bypasses proper community engagement and wastes taxpayer funds to weaken Measure D.

Supported the survey, arguing that Measure D has failed to enhance agriculture and that landowners need more flexibility to survive.

Expressed frustration with restrictions on employee housing and floor area ratios, supporting the board's effort to poll voters.

Challenged staff's procurement rationale and questioned why Tri-Valley survey results showing strong open space support were being set aside.

Supported the survey as a fact-gathering tool to understand public opinion on minor zoning and property constraints.

Expressed support for the survey as an information source while highlighting the decline of the agricultural economy over 25 years.