California Record
Alameda
Zoning

Park Station Outdoor Music and Noise Regulations

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (7)Opposed (9)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
19
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Feb 24, 2026.

Public comments (19)

SupportiveKathy WeberFeb 24, 2026

Speaking as the director of the Downtown Alameda Business Association, she supported Park Station's music events for bringing vibrancy and foot traffic downtown.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:32:26 →
OpposedKathleen SullivanFeb 24, 2026

Voiced opposition to expanding music events due to existing noise violations and disruptions in the residential neighborhood.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:34:11 →
OpposedMichael HaddonFeb 24, 2026

Shared that amplified music from the venue frequently exceeds acceptable volume levels at his home, disrupting the neighborhood.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:35:42 →
OpposedJeff RoboseFeb 24, 2026

Noted that noise from Park Station penetrates closed windows, interferes with children's bedtime, and pointed out documented permit violations.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:35:36 →
SupportiveScott WernerFeb 24, 2026

Spoke in favor of expanding live music, commending the owners for transforming a vacant property into a community asset.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:39:59 →
OpposedJim DaleyFeb 24, 2026

Raised concerns about noise travel across the neighborhood, parking shortages, and lack of responsiveness from owners.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:42:28 →
OpposedUnidentified ResidentFeb 24, 2026

An audio engineer living nearby argued that 85 decibels is dangerously loud and unprecedented for residential areas, urging the board to deny expansion.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:44:30 →
SupportiveReid WatleyFeb 24, 2026

A professional musician and resident spoke in strong support of Park Station providing a much-needed venue for local artists.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:46:22 →
ConcernedGrace RubensonFeb 24, 2026

Discussed severe neighborhood parking impacts near Chichenyo Park caused by patrons taking up all available street spaces.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:48:50 →
OpposedAnnFeb 24, 2026

Urged the board to retain original permit limits and cited unmonitored audio levels during events.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:53:31 →
OpposedRabbitFeb 24, 2026

Expressed frustration with noise and parking congestion extending blocks away from the venue.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:52:59 →
MixedBetsy MathesonFeb 24, 2026

Shared mixed feelings, praising the adaptive reuse and food while noting the music travels clearly into her backyard.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:55:13 →
MixedKirsta LeeFeb 24, 2026

Offered constructive suggestions including noise meters, time restrictions, and better neighbor outreach.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:57:46 →
OpposedArt ThomsFeb 24, 2026

Owner of neighboring washboard laundromat expressed concern over Sunday event additions conflicting with peak laundry business hours and parking.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:00:03 →
SupportiveSean AlfordFeb 24, 2026

Spoke in favor of music expansion, noting he lives nearby and has not experienced disruptive noise.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:59:53 →
OpposedJohn LegFeb 24, 2026

Emphasized that long-term residents deserve peaceful enjoyment of their homes and criticized lack of outreach.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:03:52 →
SupportiveTed AndersonFeb 24, 2026

Speaking as an owner, emphasized the importance of live music and community gathering spaces in Alameda.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:06:08 →
SupportiveEmily GruntFeb 24, 2026

Praised Park Station's extensive support for local schools and community organizations.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:07:57 →
SupportiveParker BeverlyFeb 24, 2026

Supported the permit approval, describing the venue as a well-managed and respectful community environment.

Planning Board - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:07:45 →