California Record
Alameda
Development

Encinal Terminals Interim Vehicle Storage & Neighborhood Impacts

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (1)Concerned (2)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
4
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 23, 2026.

Public comments (4)

OpposedAllison GreenMar 23, 2026

Expressed deep concern that the Encinal Terminals vehicle storage project would bring large transport trucks into a quiet residential neighborhood where families and children walk and bike.

Planning Board - Mar 23, 2026 · 1:15:24 →
ConcernedKim CatoMar 23, 2026

Asked for confirmation that all three blighted buildings would be demolished and raised safety concerns regarding storing up to 1,000 electric vehicles in a compact space.

Planning Board - Mar 23, 2026 · 1:19:54 →
NeutralDr. Ron SuarezMar 23, 2026

Shared ideas about promoting local businesses at Alameda Point and suggested exploring decentralized micro-data centers with solar panels on abandoned base buildings.

Planning Board - Mar 23, 2026 · 3:24 →
ConcernedCindy JohnsonMar 23, 2026

Speaking for Bike Walk Alameda, urged the board to condition the Encinal Terminals permit on improved dedicated pedestrian and bicycle access around the Fortman Marina driveway.

Planning Board - Mar 23, 2026 · 1:18:41 →