2026-5722 Review and Discuss Proposed Quick-Build Improvements to the Lincoln/Walnut Intersection (Discussion)
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jan 28, 2026.
Public comments (6)
A 44-year resident of Walnut Street strongly supported the proposed diverter island, detailing numerous severe collisions and property damage near his home over the years.
Transportation Commission - Jan 28, 2026 · 1:27:56 →A resident living right at Lincoln and Walnut described cars crashing into fences and houses, expressed terror backing out of his driveway, and urged the commission to approve the diverter experiment.
Transportation Commission - Jan 28, 2026 · 5:04 →Opposed the diverter island, arguing it punishes good drivers for bad behavior and that accidents are caused by human error and pedestrians crossing in dark clothing rather than engineering issues.
Transportation Commission - Jan 28, 2026 · 1:33:34 →Echoed concerns about pedestrian visibility at night and questioned the statistical significance of collision reductions and roundabout warrants.
Transportation Commission - Jan 28, 2026 · 1:37:00 →A corner resident for 20 years whose house was hit by a speeding car supported the diverter island experiment while acknowledging speed and pedestrian awareness issues.
Transportation Commission - Jan 28, 2026 · 1:40:11 →A Caltrans employee and 5-year Alameda resident suggested considering rumble strips or speed bumps on perpendicular approaches rather than islands, noting his hometown experience.
Transportation Commission - Jan 28, 2026 · 1:42:00 →